Atom D410 vs Pentium 987

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 987
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.41
+273%
Atom D410
2010
1 core / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.11

Pentium 987 outperforms Atom D410 by a whopping 273% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 987 and Atom D410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29763353
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Pentiumno data
Power efficiency2.281.04
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date1 February 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134$636

Detailed specifications

Pentium 987 and Atom D410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.67 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size131 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors504 million123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 987 and Atom D410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 987 and Atom D410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data32 Bit
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Pentium 987 and Atom D410 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 987 and Atom D410 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 987 and Atom D410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size16.38 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel GMA 3150
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 987 and Atom D410 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 987 and Atom D410.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 987 0.41
+273%
Atom D410 0.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 987 657
+265%
Atom D410 180

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.41 0.11
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.01
Recency 1 February 2013 4 January 2010
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 10 Watt

Pentium 987 has a 272.7% higher aggregate performance score, 7600% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom D410, on the other hand, has 70% lower power consumption.

The Pentium 987 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D410 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 987 and Atom D410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 987
Pentium 987
Intel Atom D410
Atom D410

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 43 votes

Rate Pentium 987 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 121 vote

Rate Atom D410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 987 or Atom D410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.