Celeron M 360 vs Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
Aggregate performance score
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 outperforms Celeron M 360 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and Celeron M 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3294 | 3334 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium 4-M | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 0.50 | 0.63 |
| Architecture codename | Northwood (2002−2004) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and Celeron M 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | 400 MHz |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB L2 KB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.26V, 1.004V-1.292V |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and Celeron M 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and Celeron M 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and Celeron M 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and Celeron M 360 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.16 | 0.14 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 21 Watt |
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 has a 14.3% higher aggregate performance score.
Celeron M 360, on the other hand, has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.
The Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 360 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and Celeron M 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
