Athlon 64 3400+ vs Pentium 4 660

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 4 660
1 core / 1 thread, 115 Watt
0.21
+5%
Athlon 64 3400+
2001
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.20

Pentium 4 660 outperforms Athlon 64 3400+ by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4 660 and Athlon 64 3400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32103232
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesPentium 4no data
Power efficiency0.170.21
Architecture codenamePrescott 2MClawhammer (2001−2005)
Release dateno dataJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 660 and Athlon 64 3400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data512K
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data193 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.2V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 660 and Athlon 64 3400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPLGA775,PPGA775754
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 660 and Athlon 64 3400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium 4 660 and Athlon 64 3400+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 660 and Athlon 64 3400+ are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 0.20
Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 89 Watt

Pentium 4 660 has a 5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 3400+, on the other hand, has 29.2% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pentium 4 660 and Athlon 64 3400+.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 660 and Athlon 64 3400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 660
Pentium 4 660
AMD Athlon 64 3400+
Athlon 64 3400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 14 votes

Rate Pentium 4 660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 20 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4 660 or Athlon 64 3400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.