A10-9700E vs Athlon X4 840

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 840
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.16
+2.9%

Athlon X4 840 outperforms A10-9700E by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 840 and A10-9700E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18491876
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Series4x Athlonno data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release dateAugust 2014 (10 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 840 and A10-9700E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache256Kno data
L2 cache4 MB2048 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size245 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C74 °C
Number of transistors2,411 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 840 and A10-9700E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSocket FM2+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 840 and A10-9700E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 840 and A10-9700E are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 840 and A10-9700E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon X4 840 and A10-9700E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon X4 840 and A10-9700E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 840 and A10-9700E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes168

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 840 2.16
+2.9%
A10-9700E 2.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X4 840 3321
+2.8%
A10-9700E 3229

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.16 2.10
Recency on August 2014 27 July 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Athlon X4 840 has a 2.9% higher aggregate performance score.

A10-9700E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Athlon X4 840 and A10-9700E.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 840 and A10-9700E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 840
Athlon X4 840
AMD A10-9700E
A10-9700E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 595 votes

Rate Athlon X4 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 46 votes

Rate A10-9700E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 840 or A10-9700E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.