Processor N150 vs Opteron X3216
Aggregate performance score
Processor N150 outperforms Opteron X3216 by a whopping 244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2610 | 1687 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 6.00 | 51.56 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Excavator (2017−2018) | Twin Lake (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 10 June 2017 (7 years ago) | 20 November 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Opteron X3216 and Processor N150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (shared) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 250 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 82 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,100 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron X3216 and Processor N150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP4 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron X3216 and Processor N150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Opteron X3216 and Processor N150 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron X3216 and Processor N150 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron X3216 and Processor N150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon Rx Series 4CU | Intel UHD Graphics 730 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron X3216 and Processor N150.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.94 | 3.23 |
| Recency | 10 June 2017 | 20 November 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Processor N150 has a 243.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.
The Intel Processor N150 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Opteron X3216 in performance tests.
Be aware that Opteron X3216 is a server/workstation processor while Processor N150 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
