Atom C3508 vs Opteron X2170

VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron X2170
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.20
+6.2%
Atom C3508
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 11 Watt
1.13

Opteron X2170 outperforms Atom C3508 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron X2170 and Atom C3508 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23492398
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency4.549.50
Architecture codenameSteppe Eagle (2016)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date1 September 2016 (8 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron X2170 and Atom C3508 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache64 KB (per core)224 KB
L2 cache2 MB (shared)8 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Opteron X2170 and Atom C3508 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFT3FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt11.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron X2170 and Atom C3508. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

Opteron X2170 and Atom C3508 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron X2170 and Atom C3508 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron X2170 and Atom C3508. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data29.871 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon R5Eno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron X2170 and Atom C3508.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data8
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data8
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron X2170 1.20
+6.2%
Atom C3508 1.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron X2170 1911
+6.4%
Atom C3508 1796

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.20 1.13
Recency 1 September 2016 15 August 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 11 Watt

Opteron X2170 has a 6.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom C3508, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 127.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Opteron X2170 and Atom C3508.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron X2170 and Atom C3508, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron X2170
Opteron X2170
Intel Atom C3508
Atom C3508

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron X2170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron X2170 or Atom C3508, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.