Steam Deck OLED APU vs Opteron 6348
Aggregate performance score
Opteron 6348 outperforms Steam Deck OLED APU by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 6348 and Steam Deck OLED APU processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1226 | 1288 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | no data | Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) |
Power efficiency | 4.06 | 29.09 |
Architecture codename | Abu Dhabi (2012) | Van Gogh (Custom) (2023) |
Release date | 5 November 2012 (12 years ago) | 9 November 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Opteron 6348 and Steam Deck OLED APU basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 12 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
L1 cache | 576 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 6 nm |
Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 2,400 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6348 and Steam Deck OLED APU compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | no data |
Socket | G34 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6348 and Steam Deck OLED APU. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6348 and Steam Deck OLED APU are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6348 and Steam Deck OLED APU. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6348 and Steam Deck OLED APU.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 4.96 | 4.63 |
Recency | 5 November 2012 | 9 November 2023 |
Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
Threads | 12 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 15 Watt |
Opteron 6348 has a 7.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
Steam Deck OLED APU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 433.3% more advanced lithography process, and 666.7% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Opteron 6348 and Steam Deck OLED APU.
Be aware that Opteron 6348 is a server/workstation processor while Steam Deck OLED APU is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6348 and Steam Deck OLED APU, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.