FX-9830P vs Opteron 6276

VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6276
2011
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
4.00
+90.5%
FX-9830P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.10

Opteron 6276 outperforms FX-9830P by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6276 and FX-9830P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14161871
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.48no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency3.295.68
Architecture codenameInterlagos (2011−2012)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date14 November 2011 (13 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6276 and FX-9830P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache768 KB320 KB
L2 cache16 MB1 MB (per module)
L3 cache8 MB (per die)no data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size316 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors2,400 million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6276 and FX-9830P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketG34FP4
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6276 and FX-9830P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6276 and FX-9830P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6276 and FX-9830P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6276 and FX-9830P.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6276 4.00
+90.5%
FX-9830P 2.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 6276 6348
+90.5%
FX-9830P 3332

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Opteron 6276 357
FX-9830P 596
+66.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Opteron 6276 2441
+68.9%
FX-9830P 1445

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.00 2.10
Recency 14 November 2011 31 May 2016
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 35 Watt

Opteron 6276 has a 90.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

FX-9830P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 228.6% lower power consumption.

The Opteron 6276 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9830P in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 6276 is a server/workstation processor while FX-9830P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6276 and FX-9830P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6276
Opteron 6276
AMD FX-9830P
FX-9830P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 51 vote

Rate Opteron 6276 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 113 votes

Rate FX-9830P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6276 or FX-9830P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.