EPYC 7763 vs Opteron 6276

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6276
2011
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
4.10
EPYC 7763
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
54.72
+1235%

EPYC 7763 outperforms Opteron 6276 by a whopping 1235% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6276 and EPYC 7763 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking133421
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.3734.40
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameInterlagos (2011−2012)Milan (2021)
Release date14 November 2011 (12 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119$7,890
Current price$308 (2.6x MSRP)$1641 (0.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7763 has 2411% better value for money than Opteron 6276.

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6276 and EPYC 7763 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads16128
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.45 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache768 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (per die)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm+
Die size316 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors2,400 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6276 and EPYC 7763 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration42
SocketG34SP3
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6276 and EPYC 7763. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6276 and EPYC 7763 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6276 and EPYC 7763. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6276 and EPYC 7763.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6276 4.10
EPYC 7763 54.72
+1235%

EPYC 7763 outperforms Opteron 6276 by 1235% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Opteron 6276 6348
EPYC 7763 84634
+1233%

EPYC 7763 outperforms Opteron 6276 by 1233% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Opteron 6276 357
EPYC 7763 1410
+295%

EPYC 7763 outperforms Opteron 6276 by 295% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Opteron 6276 2441
EPYC 7763 10969
+349%

EPYC 7763 outperforms Opteron 6276 by 349% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.10 54.72
Recency 14 November 2011 15 March 2021
Physical cores 16 64
Threads 16 128
Cost $119 $7890
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 7763 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6276 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6276 and EPYC 7763, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6276
Opteron 6276
AMD EPYC 7763
EPYC 7763

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 51 vote

Rate Opteron 6276 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1196 votes

Rate EPYC 7763 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6276 or EPYC 7763, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.