Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Opteron 6276

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6276
2011
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
4.10
+583%
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 125 Watt
0.60

Opteron 6276 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 6000+ by a whopping 583% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6276 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13342690
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.371.10
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameInterlagos (2011−2012)Windsor (2006−2009)
Release date14 November 2011 (12 years ago)August 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119no data
Current price$308 (2.6x MSRP)$89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Opteron 6276 has 25% better value for money than Athlon 64 X2 6000+.

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6276 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache768 KB256 KB
L2 cache16 MB512K
L3 cache8 MB (per die)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size316 mm2220 mm2
Number of transistors2,400 million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6276 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketG34AM2
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6276 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6276 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6276 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6276 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6276 4.10
+583%
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 0.60

Opteron 6276 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 6000+ by 583% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Opteron 6276 6348
+580%
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 934

Opteron 6276 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 6000+ by 580% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Opteron 6276 357
+28%
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 279

Opteron 6276 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 6000+ by 28% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Opteron 6276 2441
+383%
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 505

Opteron 6276 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 6000+ by 383% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.10 0.60
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 125 Watt

The Opteron 6276 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 6276 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6276 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6276
Opteron 6276
AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Athlon 64 X2 6000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 51 vote

Rate Opteron 6276 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 304 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6276 or Athlon 64 X2 6000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.