EPYC 7532 vs Opteron 6276

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6276 and EPYC 7532 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1334	98
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.37	38.45
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	no data	AMD EPYC
Architecture codename	Interlagos (2011−2012)	Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date	14 November 2011 (12 years ago)	19 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$119	no data
Current price	$308 (2.6x MSRP)	$800

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7532 has 2707% better value for money than Opteron 6276.

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6276 and EPYC 7532 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	16 (Hexadeca-Core)	32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads	16	64
Base clock speed	2.3 GHz	2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.2 GHz	3.3 GHz
L1 cache	768 KB	2 MB
L2 cache	16 MB	16 MB
L3 cache	8 MB (per die)	256 MB
Chip lithography	32 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Die size	316 mm2	no data
Number of transistors	2,400 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6276 and EPYC 7532 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	4	no data
Socket	G34	Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6276 and EPYC 7532. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	no data
AVX	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6276 and EPYC 7532 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6276 and EPYC 7532. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	no data	4 TiB
Max memory channels	no data	8
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support	no data	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6276 and EPYC 7532.

PCIe version

2.0

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7532 outperforms Opteron 6276 by 737% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	4.10	34.30
Recency	14 November 2011	19 February 2020
Physical cores	16	32
Threads	16	64
Chip lithography	32 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	200 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6276 and EPYC 7532, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---