Xeon Gold 5412U vs EPYC 7532

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7532
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
33.21
+0.4%
Xeon Gold 5412U
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 185 Watt
33.09

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7532 and Xeon Gold 5412U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking119121
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data92.56
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency15.7116.93
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date19 February 2020 (4 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,113

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7532 and Xeon Gold 5412U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads6448
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache2 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB45 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7532 and Xeon Gold 5412U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket SP3FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7532 and Xeon Gold 5412U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7532 and Xeon Gold 5412U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7532 and Xeon Gold 5412U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7532 and Xeon Gold 5412U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7532 and Xeon Gold 5412U.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7532 33.21
+0.4%
Xeon Gold 5412U 33.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7532 52755
+0.4%
Xeon Gold 5412U 52557

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.21 33.09
Recency 19 February 2020 10 January 2023
Physical cores 32 24
Threads 64 48
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 185 Watt

EPYC 7532 has a 0.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Xeon Gold 5412U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 8.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7532 and Xeon Gold 5412U.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7532 and Xeon Gold 5412U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7532
EPYC 7532
Intel Xeon Gold 5412U
Xeon Gold 5412U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7532 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 11 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5412U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7532 or Xeon Gold 5412U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.