Atom CE4150 vs Opteron 4386
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 4386 and Atom CE4150 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1889 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 2.05 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Seoul (2012) | Sodaville (2009) |
| Release date | 4 December 2012 (11 years ago) | 24 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Opteron 4386 and Atom CE4150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 56 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 96 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 47 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 4386 and Atom CE4150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | C32 | Intel BGA 951 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 4386 and Atom CE4150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 4386 and Atom CE4150 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 4386 and Atom CE4150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 December 2012 | 24 September 2009 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 7 Watt |
Opteron 4386 has an age advantage of 3 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
Atom CE4150, on the other hand, has 1257.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Opteron 4386 and Atom CE4150. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Opteron 4386 is a server/workstation processor while Atom CE4150 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 4386 and Atom CE4150, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
