U300 vs Opteron 3380

VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 3380
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
2.65

U300 outperforms Opteron 3380 by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 3380 and U300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17161182
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency3.798.98
Architecture codenameDelhi (2012−2013)no data
Release date4 December 2012 (11 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron 3380 and U300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)no data
Threads86
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache8192 KBno data
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)8 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 3380 and U300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 3380 and U300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Opteron 3380 and U300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 3380 and U300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 3380 and U300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267
Maximum memory sizeno data96 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® UHD Graphics for 13th Gen Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz
Execution Unitsno data48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Opteron 3380 and U300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Opteron 3380 and U300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Opteron 3380 and U300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 3380 and U300.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 3380 2.65
U300 5.32
+101%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 3380 4134
U300 8299
+101%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.65 5.32
Recency 4 December 2012 1 January 2023
Threads 8 6
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 55 Watt

Opteron 3380 has 33.3% more threads.

U300, on the other hand, has a 100.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

The U300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 3380 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 3380 is a server/workstation processor while U300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 3380 and U300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron  3380
Opteron 3380
Intel U300
U300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 5 votes

Rate Opteron 3380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate U300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 3380 or U300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.