Apple M2 Pro vs Opteron 156

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 156 and Apple M2 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated536
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
Architecture codenameVenus (2004−2005)no data
Release date4 May 2005 (19 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron 156 and Apple M2 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speed3 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB3.3 MB
L2 cache1 MB36 MB
L3 cache0 KB24 MB
Chip lithography90 nm5 nm
Die size115 mm2no data
Number of transistors114 million40000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 156 and Apple M2 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket939no data
Power consumption (TDP)104 Watt2424 ‑ 3504 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 156 and Apple M2 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 May 2005 17 January 2023
Physical cores 1 12
Threads 1 12
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 104 Watt 2424 Watt

Opteron 156 has 2230.8% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Pro, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Opteron 156 and Apple M2 Pro. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Opteron 156 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Pro is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 156 and Apple M2 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 156
Opteron 156
Apple M2 Pro
M2 Pro

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Opteron 156 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 172 votes

Rate Apple M2 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 156 or Apple M2 Pro, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.