Opteron 156 vs Apple M2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1052not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple Apple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiency18.00no data
DesignerAppleAMD
Architecture codenameno dataVenus (2004−2005)
Release date10 June 2022 (3 years ago)4 May 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

M2 and Opteron 156 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed2.424 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.48 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache2 MB128 KB
L2 cache20 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography5 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data115 mm2
Number of transistors20000 Million114 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on M2 and Opteron 156 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data939
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt104 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 and Opteron 156. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 June 2022 4 May 2005
Physical cores 8 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 5 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 104 Watt

Apple M2 has an age advantage of 17 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 1700% more advanced lithography process, and 420% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Apple M2 and AMD Opteron 156. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M2 is a notebook processor while Opteron 156 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 801 votes

Rate M2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Opteron 156 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors M2 and Opteron 156, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.