Xeon 7110N vs Opteron 142

VS

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 142 and Xeon 7110N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3128not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency0.30no data
Architecture codenameSledgeHammer (2003−2005)Tulsa (2006)
Release dateSeptember 2003 (21 year ago)August 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron 142 and Xeon 7110N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB0 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography130 nm65 nm
Die size193 mm2435 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data60 °C
Number of transistors106 million1328 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.1V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 142 and Xeon 7110N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket940PPGA604
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 142 and Xeon 7110N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

Opteron 142 and Xeon 7110N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 142 and Xeon 7110N are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 142 and Xeon 7110N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 130 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 95 Watt

Opteron 142 has 11.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon 7110N, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Opteron 142 and Xeon 7110N. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 142 and Xeon 7110N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 142
Opteron 142
Intel Xeon 7110N
Xeon 7110N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 6 votes

Rate Opteron 142 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 7110N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 142 or Xeon 7110N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.