Opteron 4310 EE vs Opteron 142
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 142 and Opteron 4310 EE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3144 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.30 | no data |
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | Seoul (2012) |
| Release date | September 2003 (21 year ago) | 4 December 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $415 |
Detailed specifications
Opteron 142 and Opteron 4310 EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 142 and Opteron 4310 EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | 940 | C32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 142 and Opteron 4310 EE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 142 and Opteron 4310 EE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 142 and Opteron 4310 EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 142 and Opteron 4310 EE.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 35 Watt |
Opteron 4310 EE has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 142.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Opteron 142 and Opteron 4310 EE. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 142 and Opteron 4310 EE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
