Athlon 1100 vs Opteron 142

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3383not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.12no data
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameSledgeHammer (2003−2005)Thunderbird B (2000−2001)
Release dateSeptember 2003 (22 years ago)14 August 2000 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$853

Detailed specifications

Opteron 142 and Athlon 1100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography130 nm180 nm
Die size193 mm2120 mm2
Number of transistors106 million37 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 142 and Athlon 1100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket940A
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt60 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 142 and Athlon 1100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 60 Watt

Opteron 142 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 1100, on the other hand, has 41.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron 142 and AMD Athlon 1100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Opteron 142 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 1100 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 142
Opteron 142
AMD Athlon 1100
Athlon 1100

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 6 votes

Rate Opteron 142 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 10 votes

Rate Athlon 1100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Opteron 142 and Athlon 1100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.