Apple M2 Max vs Mobile Sempron M100

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Sempron M100
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 512 Watt
0.20
Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 36 Watt
15.21
+7505%

M2 Max outperforms Mobile Sempron M100 by a whopping 7505% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3489521
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Mobile SempronApple M-Series
DesignerAMDApple
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)no data
Release date10 September 2009 (16 years ago)17 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron M100 and M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speedno data2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB3.3 MB
L2 cache512 KB36 MB
L3 cacheno data48 MB
Chip lithography40 nm5 nm
Number of transistorsno data67000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron M100 and M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSno data
Power consumption (TDP)512 KB36 MB + 48 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron M100 and M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsAMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMXno data
VirusProtect+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 15.21
Recency 10 September 2009 17 January 2023
Physical cores 1 12
Threads 1 12
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 512 Watt 36 Watt

Apple M2 Max has a 7505% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 1322.2% lower power consumption.

The Apple M2 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Mobile Sempron M100 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron M100
Mobile Sempron M100
Apple M2 Max
M2 Max

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 9 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron M100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 254 votes

Rate M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Mobile Sempron M100 and M2 Max, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.