Apple M1 vs Mobile Sempron M100
Aggregate performance score
Apple M1 outperforms Mobile Sempron M100 by a whopping 2250% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Sempron M100 and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3201 | 1206 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Mobile Sempron | Apple Apple M-Series |
| Power efficiency | 0.83 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Caspian (2009) | no data |
| Release date | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 10 November 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Sempron M100 and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.064 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3200 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 2 MB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Number of transistors | no data | 16000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Sempron M100 and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron M100 and Apple M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | AMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMX | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M1 8-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.22 | 5.17 |
| Recency | 10 September 2009 | 10 November 2020 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 5 nm |
Apple M1 has a 2250% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
The Apple M1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron M100 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron M100 and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
