Athlon 64 X2 5200+ vs Mobile Sempron 2800+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron 2800+ and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2840
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesMobile Sempronno data
Power efficiencyno data0.57
Architecture codenameGeorgetownWindsor (2006−2007)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)September 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron 2800+ and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data512K
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithographyno data90 nm
Die sizeno data220 mm2
Number of transistorsno data154 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron 2800+ and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM2
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt89 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Sempron 2800+ 237
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 851
+259%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 89 Watt

Mobile Sempron 2800+ has 43.5% lower power consumption.

Athlon 64 X2 5200+, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron 2800+ and Athlon 64 X2 5200+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobile Sempron 2800+ is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron 2800+ and Athlon 64 X2 5200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron 2800+
Mobile Sempron 2800+
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Athlon 64 X2 5200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 7 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron 2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 311 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron 2800+ or Athlon 64 X2 5200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.