Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Mobile Pentium 4 HT 532
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Pentium 4 HT 532 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 297 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 40.38 |
| Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| Release date | June 2004 (20 years ago) | 16 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Pentium 4 HT 532 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.07 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 8 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 112 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 75 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 125 million | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Pentium 4 HT 532 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 478 | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Pentium 4 HT 532 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Pentium 4 HT 532 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Pentium 4 HT 532 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 780M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Pentium 4 HT 532 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 45 Watt |
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 2150% more advanced lithography process, and 95.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Mobile Pentium 4 HT 532 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Mobile Pentium 4 HT 532 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Pentium 4 HT 532 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
