Pentium 4 HT 3.0E vs Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Pentium 4 HT 3.0E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesMobile Athlon 64no data
Architecture codenameOakville (2003−2004)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release dateAugust 2003 (21 year ago)February 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Pentium 4 HT 3.0E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128K16 KB
L2 cache512K1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithographyno data90 nm
Die size193 mm2109 mm2
Number of transistors106 million125 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Pentium 4 HT 3.0E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt115 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Pentium 4 HT 3.0E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR1, DDR2

Pros & cons summary


Threads 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 115 Watt

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ has 228.6% lower power consumption.

Pentium 4 HT 3.0E, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Pentium 4 HT 3.0E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is a notebook processor while Pentium 4 HT 3.0E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Pentium 4 HT 3.0E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.0E
Pentium 4 HT 3.0E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 59 votes

Rate Pentium 4 HT 3.0E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ or Pentium 4 HT 3.0E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.