Xeon w9-3495X vs Geode LX 800
Primary details
Comparing Geode LX 800 and Xeon w9-3495X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 17 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Geode LX | no data |
| Architecture codename | Castle | Sapphire Rapids |
| Release date | no data | 1 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Current price | $300 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Geode LX 800 and Xeon w9-3495X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 56 (Hexapentaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 112 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.5 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 105 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 4x 477 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 81 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 81 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Geode LX 800 and Xeon w9-3495X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3.6 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Geode LX 800 and Xeon w9-3495X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
Geode LX 800 and Xeon w9-3495X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Geode LX 800 and Xeon w9-3495X are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Geode LX 800 and Xeon w9-3495X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Geode LX 800 and Xeon w9-3495X.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 112 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 56 |
| Threads | 1 | 112 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 350 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Geode LX 800 and Xeon w9-3495X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Geode LX 800 is a notebook processor while Xeon w9-3495X is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Geode LX 800 and Xeon w9-3495X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
