Celeron M 370 vs M 380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 380
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.17
+13.3%
Celeron M 370
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.15

Celeron M 380 outperforms Celeron M 370 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 380 and Celeron M 370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32843317
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MCeleron M
Power efficiency0.770.68
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 380 and Celeron M 370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz400 MHz
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292V1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 380 and Celeron M 370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 380 and Celeron M 370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)--
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States--
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bit32 Bit
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Celeron M 380 and Celeron M 370 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 380 and Celeron M 370 are enumerated here.

VT-x--

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 380 0.17
+13.3%
Celeron M 370 0.15

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron M 380 111
+9%
Celeron M 370 121

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 0.15

Celeron M 380 has a 13.3% higher aggregate performance score.

The Celeron M 380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 370 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 380 and Celeron M 370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 380
Celeron M 380
Intel Celeron M 370
Celeron M 370

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Celeron M 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 380 or Celeron M 370, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.