Atom CE4150 vs GX-210JA
Primary details
Comparing GX-210JA and Atom CE4150 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD | no data |
| Architecture codename | Temash (2013) | Sodaville (2009) |
| Release date | 23 May 2013 (11 years ago) | 24 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
GX-210JA and Atom CE4150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 56 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 96 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 47 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on GX-210JA and Atom CE4150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FT3 BGA | Intel BGA 951 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by GX-210JA and Atom CE4150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by GX-210JA and Atom CE4150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 May 2013 | 24 September 2009 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 7 Watt |
GX-210JA has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 16.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GX-210JA and Atom CE4150. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between GX-210JA and Atom CE4150, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
