GX-210JA vs i3-2308M
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-2308M and GX-210JA processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 3305 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i3 | AMD |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.52 |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Temash (2013) |
| Release date | 20 February 2011 (13 years ago) | 23 May 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-2308M and GX-210JA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 21 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 149 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 85 (PGA); 100(BGA) °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 624 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-2308M and GX-210JA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | rPGA988B / BGA1023 | FT3 BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2308M and GX-210JA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2308M and GX-210JA are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2308M and GX-210JA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 3000 (650 - 1100 MHz) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 February 2011 | 23 May 2013 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 6 Watt |
i3-2308M has 100% more threads.
GX-210JA, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-2308M and GX-210JA. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2308M and GX-210JA, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
