Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs FX-9800P
Primary details
Comparing FX-9800P and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1988 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Bristol Ridge | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Merom-2M (2008) |
Release date | 1 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) |
Current price | $926 | no data |
Detailed specifications
FX-9800P and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
Bus support | no data | 533 MHz |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | 250 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 3100 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on FX-9800P and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | no data | P |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9800P and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8 | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9800P and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 outperforms FX-9800P by 226% in wPrime 32.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 June 2016 | 1 May 2008 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
We couldn't decide between FX-9800P and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9800P and Celeron Dual-Core T1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.