Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs A6-7310

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-7310
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.69
+293%
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.43

A6-7310 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1400 by a whopping 293% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-7310 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20602974
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency6.391.16
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Merom-2M (2008)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)1 May 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-7310 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors930 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-7310 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4P
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-7310 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-7310 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-7310 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 Graphicsno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-7310 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-7310 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-7310 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-7310 1.69
+293%
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 0.43

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A6-7310 5075
+86.2%
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 2725

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 0.43
Recency 7 May 2015 1 May 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 35 Watt

A6-7310 has a 293% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 191.7% lower power consumption.

The A6-7310 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-7310 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-7310
A6-7310
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 513 votes

Rate A6-7310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 285 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-7310 or Celeron Dual-Core T1400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.