Atom x7433RE vs FX-9800P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9800P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.60
Atom x7433RE
2024
4 cores / 4 threads, 9 Watt
2.64
+65%

Atom x7433RE outperforms FX-9800P by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9800P and Atom x7433RE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20931714
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency10.0927.76
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Amston Lake (2024)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$63

Detailed specifications

FX-9800P and Atom x7433RE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache320 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per module)2 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9800P and Atom x7433RE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP4Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9800P and Atom x7433RE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9800P and Atom x7433RE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9800P and Atom x7433RE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 32EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9800P and Atom x7433RE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes89

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9800P 1.60
Atom x7433RE 2.64
+65%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-9800P 2543
Atom x7433RE 4194
+64.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.60 2.64
Recency 31 May 2016 8 April 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 9 Watt

Atom x7433RE has a 65% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Atom x7433RE is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9800P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9800P and Atom x7433RE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9800P
FX-9800P
Intel Atom x7433RE
Atom x7433RE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 44 votes

Rate FX-9800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x7433RE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9800P or Atom x7433RE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.