Athlon Gold 3150G vs FX-9800P

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9800P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.60
Athlon Gold 3150G
2020
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.37
+173%

Athlon Gold 3150G outperforms FX-9800P by a whopping 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9800P and Athlon Gold 3150G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20911346
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency10.096.36
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Dali (2020)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-9800P and Athlon Gold 3150G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache320 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per module)512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm12 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on FX-9800P and Athlon Gold 3150G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9800P and Athlon Gold 3150G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9800P and Athlon Gold 3150G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9800P and Athlon Gold 3150G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4-2933

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9800P and Athlon Gold 3150G.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9800P 1.60
Athlon Gold 3150G 4.37
+173%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-9800P 2543
Athlon Gold 3150G 6944
+173%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.60 4.37
Integrated graphics card 1.95 2.98
Recency 31 May 2016 21 July 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

FX-9800P has 333.3% lower power consumption.

Athlon Gold 3150G, on the other hand, has a 173.1% higher aggregate performance score, 52.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Athlon Gold 3150G is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9800P in performance tests.

Be aware that FX-9800P is a notebook processor while Athlon Gold 3150G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9800P and Athlon Gold 3150G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9800P
FX-9800P
AMD Athlon Gold 3150G
Athlon Gold 3150G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 44 votes

Rate FX-9800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 18 votes

Rate Athlon Gold 3150G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9800P or Athlon Gold 3150G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.