Xeon Platinum 8376HL vs FX-8320E

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8376HL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1501not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.91no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Cooper Lake-SP (2021)
Release date2 September 2014 (9 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$140 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8376HL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads856
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data38.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8376HL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration18
SocketAM3+FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8376HL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8376HL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8376HL are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8376HL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 RDIMM
Maximum memory sizeno data4.5 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8376HL.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2014 6 April 2021
Physical cores 8 28
Threads 8 56
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 205 Watt

We couldn't decide between FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8376HL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FX-8320E is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8376HL is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8376HL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320E
FX-8320E
Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL
Xeon Platinum 8376HL

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1016 votes

Rate FX-8320E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8376HL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320E or Xeon Platinum 8376HL, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.