Celeron G3920 vs FX-8120

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8120
2011
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
4.15
+180%
Celeron G3920
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.48

FX-8120 outperforms Celeron G3920 by a whopping 180% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8120 and Celeron G3920 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13822149
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.17
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency3.142.75
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$52

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8120 and Celeron G3920 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data29
L1 cache384 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2150 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.0125 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8120 and Celeron G3920 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8120 and Celeron G3920. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

FX-8120 and Celeron G3920 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8120 and Celeron G3920 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8120 and Celeron G3920. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 510
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data950 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-8120 and Celeron G3920 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by FX-8120 and Celeron G3920 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-8120 and Celeron G3920 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8120 and Celeron G3920.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8120 4.15
+180%
Celeron G3920 1.48

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8120 6594
+180%
Celeron G3920 2358

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-8120 411
Celeron G3920 603
+46.7%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-8120 1523
+48.4%
Celeron G3920 1026

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.15 1.48
Recency 12 October 2011 1 September 2015
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 51 Watt

FX-8120 has a 180.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron G3920, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 145.1% lower power consumption.

The FX-8120 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3920 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8120 and Celeron G3920, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8120
FX-8120
Intel Celeron G3920
Celeron G3920

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 967 votes

Rate FX-8120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 9 votes

Rate Celeron G3920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8120 or Celeron G3920, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.