Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs FX-770K

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-770K
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.93
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
16.91
+776%

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS outperforms FX-770K by a whopping 776% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-770K and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1966388
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.8056.86
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Hawk Point (2024)
Release dateDecember 2014 (10 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-770K and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache256K64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size245 mm2178 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-770K and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FP7
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-770K and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-770K and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-770K and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-770K and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-770K 1.93
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS 16.91
+776%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-770K 3060
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS 26862
+778%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.93 16.91
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a 776.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-770K in performance tests.

Note that FX-770K is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-770K and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-770K
FX-770K
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 7 votes

Rate FX-770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 12 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-770K or Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.