Atom x5-Z8350 vs FX-770K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-770K
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.93
+245%

FX-770K outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by a whopping 245% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-770K and Atom x5-Z8350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19662838
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno data5x Intel Atom
Power efficiency2.81no data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
Release dateDecember 2014 (10 years ago)8 February 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-770K and Atom x5-Z8350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.44 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.92 GHz
L1 cache256Kno data
L2 cache4 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-770K and Atom x5-Z8350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM2+UTFCBGA592
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-770K and Atom x5-Z8350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

FX-770K and Atom x5-Z8350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Bootno data+
Identity Protection-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-770K and Atom x5-Z8350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-770K and Atom x5-Z8350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-21334 GB
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 500 MHz)
Max video memoryno data2 GB
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-770K and Atom x5-Z8350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by FX-770K and Atom x5-Z8350 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data1920x1080

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-770K and Atom x5-Z8350.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes161
USB revisionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-770K 1.93
+245%
Atom x5-Z8350 0.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-770K 3060
+243%
Atom x5-Z8350 892

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.93 0.56
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

FX-770K has a 244.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom x5-Z8350, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The FX-770K is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-Z8350 in performance tests.

Note that FX-770K is a desktop processor while Atom x5-Z8350 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-770K and Atom x5-Z8350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-770K
FX-770K
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Atom x5-Z8350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 7 votes

Rate FX-770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 379 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-770K or Atom x5-Z8350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.