FX-4320 vs FX-6350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FX-6350
2013
6 cores / 6 threads
2.94
+46.3%

FX-6350 outperforms FX-4320 by a considerable 46% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6350 and FX-4320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking15541815
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.994.00
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date29 April 2013 (11 years ago)23 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Current price$69 $53

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-4320 has 304% better value for money than FX-6350.

Detailed specifications

FX-6350 and FX-4320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.9 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cache6144 KB4096 KB
L3 cacheno data4096 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C71 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.25 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6350 and FX-4320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6350 and FX-4320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6350 and FX-4320 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6350 and FX-4320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1866

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6350 and FX-4320.

PCIe versionn/aNot Listed

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6350 2.94
+46.3%
FX-4320 2.01

FX-6350 outperforms FX-4320 by 46% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-6350 4546
+46%
FX-4320 3114

FX-6350 outperforms FX-4320 by 46% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.94 2.01
Recency 29 April 2013 23 October 2012
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 95 Watt

The FX-6350 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4320 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6350 and FX-4320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6350
FX-6350
AMD FX-4320
FX-4320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 341 vote

Rate FX-6350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 129 votes

Rate FX-4320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6350 or FX-4320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.