FX-6350 vs FX-8320E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8320E
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.12
+8%
FX-6350
2013
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.89

FX-8320E outperforms FX-6350 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320E and FX-6350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16271670
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.83no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.112.19
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)29 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$147no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8320E and FX-6350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads86
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.2 GHz
L2 cache8192 KB6144 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C61 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 VMin: 1.25 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320E and FX-6350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320E and FX-6350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320E and FX-6350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320E and FX-6350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320E and FX-6350.

PCIe versionn/an/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8320E 3.12
+8%
FX-6350 2.89

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8320E 4960
+8%
FX-6350 4591

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-8320E 438
FX-6350 483
+10.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-8320E 1685
+10.2%
FX-6350 1529

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

FX-8320E 6460
+14.7%
FX-6350 5630

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.12 2.89
Recency 2 September 2014 29 April 2013
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 8 6
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

FX-8320E has a 8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 31.6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FX-8320E and FX-6350.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320E and FX-6350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320E
FX-8320E
AMD FX-6350
FX-6350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1117 votes

Rate FX-8320E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 375 votes

Rate FX-6350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320E or FX-6350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.