Phenom II X6 1075T vs FX-6350

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6350
2013
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.90
+34.3%
Phenom II X6 1075T
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.16

FX-6350 outperforms Phenom II X6 1075T by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6350 and Phenom II X6 1075T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16701859
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.22
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.201.64
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Thuban (2010)
Release date29 April 2013 (11 years ago)21 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$260

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-6350 and Phenom II X6 1075T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads66
Base clock speed3.9 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache6144 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm2346 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million904 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.25 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6350 and Phenom II X6 1075T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM3
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6350 and Phenom II X6 1075T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6350 and Phenom II X6 1075T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6350 and Phenom II X6 1075T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6350 and Phenom II X6 1075T.

PCIe versionn/a2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6350 2.90
+34.3%
Phenom II X6 1075T 2.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6350 4604
+33.9%
Phenom II X6 1075T 3438

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

FX-6350 5630
Phenom II X6 1075T 5900
+4.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.90 2.16
Recency 29 April 2013 21 September 2010
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

FX-6350 has a 34.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The FX-6350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X6 1075T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6350 and Phenom II X6 1075T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6350
FX-6350
AMD Phenom II X6 1075T
Phenom II X6 1075T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 377 votes

Rate FX-6350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 281 vote

Rate Phenom II X6 1075T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6350 or Phenom II X6 1075T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.