Pentium G4400TE vs FX-6300

Primary details

Comparing FX-6300 and Pentium G4400TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1627	2118
Place by popularity	58	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.32	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	Intel Pentium
Architecture codename	Vishera (2012−2015)	Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date	23 October 2012 (11 years ago)	1 September 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$64
Current price	$64	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

FX-6300 and Pentium G4400TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	6 (Hexa-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	6	2
Base clock speed	3.5 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	3.8 GHz	2.4 GHz
Bus support	no data	4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache	288 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	6144 KB	512 KB
L3 cache	8192 KB	3 MB
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm
Die size	315 mm2	98.57 mm210.3 mm × 9.57 mm
Maximum core temperature	71 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,200 million	1750 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No
P0 Vcore voltage	Min: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 V	no data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and Pentium G4400TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	AM3+	LGA-1151
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Pentium G4400TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	no data
AVX	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Pentium G4400TE are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	no data
VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Pentium G4400TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-1866	DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory size	no data	64 GB
Max memory channels	no data	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support	no data	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Intel HD Graphics 510

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Pentium G4400TE.

PCIe version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6300 outperforms Pentium G4400TE by 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.67	1.42
Recency	23 October 2012	1 September 2015
Physical cores	6	2
Threads	6	2
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and Pentium G4400TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---