Apple M3 Max 14-Core vs FX-6300

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6300
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.70
Apple M3 Max 14-Core
2023
14 cores / 14 threads, 78 Watt
23.89
+785%

Apple M3 Max 14-Core outperforms FX-6300 by a whopping 785% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6300 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1710220
Place by popularity66not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.55no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M3
Power efficiency2.5927.93
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)no data
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)30 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$132no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-6300 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads614
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.748 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.06 GHz
L1 cache288 KBno data
L2 cache6144 KBno data
L3 cache8192 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million92000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt78 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6300 2.70
Apple M3 Max 14-Core 23.89
+785%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6300 4137
Apple M3 Max 14-Core 36563
+784%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.70 23.89
Recency 23 October 2012 30 October 2023
Physical cores 6 14
Threads 6 14
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 78 Watt

Apple M3 Max 14-Core has a 784.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads, a 966.7% more advanced lithography process, and 21.8% lower power consumption.

The Apple M3 Max 14-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6300 in performance tests.

Note that FX-6300 is a desktop processor while Apple M3 Max 14-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6300
FX-6300
Apple M3 Max 14-Core
M3 Max 14-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4045 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 57 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 14-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6300 or Apple M3 Max 14-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.