Apple M3 Max 14-Core vs FX-8350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8350
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.74
Apple M3 Max 14-Core
2023
14 cores / 14 threads, 78 Watt
22.98
+514%

Apple M3 Max 14-Core outperforms FX-8350 by a whopping 514% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8350 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1486226
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.88no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD FX-Series (Desktop)Apple M3
Power efficiency2.8327.88
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)no data
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)30 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8350 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads814
Base clock speed4 GHz2.748 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.06 GHz
L2 cache8192 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million92000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8350 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt78 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8350 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1no data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8350 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8350 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8350 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8350 3.74
Apple M3 Max 14-Core 22.98
+514%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8350 5936
Apple M3 Max 14-Core 36505
+515%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.74 22.98
Recency 23 October 2012 30 October 2023
Physical cores 8 14
Threads 8 14
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 78 Watt

Apple M3 Max 14-Core has a 514.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 75% more physical cores and 75% more threads, a 966.7% more advanced lithography process, and 60.3% lower power consumption.

The Apple M3 Max 14-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8350 in performance tests.

Note that FX-8350 is a desktop processor while Apple M3 Max 14-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8350 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8350
FX-8350
Apple M3 Max 14-Core
M3 Max 14-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3736 votes

Rate FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 67 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 14-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8350 or Apple M3 Max 14-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.