Core 2 Duo E6600 vs FX-6100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6100
2011
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.38
+303%

FX-6100 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6600 by a whopping 303% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6100 and Core 2 Duo E6600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16992694
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.993.46
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataCore 2 Duo (Desktop)
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Conroe (2006−2007)
Release date12 October 2011 (12 years ago)no data
Current price$39 $30

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Core 2 Duo E6600 has 16% better value for money than FX-6100.

Detailed specifications

FX-6100 and Core 2 Duo E6600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus supportno data1066 MHz
L1 cache288 KBno data
L2 cache6 MBno data
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on FX-6100 and Core 2 Duo E6600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6100 and Core 2 Duo E6600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6100 and Core 2 Duo E6600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6100 and Core 2 Duo E6600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6100 and Core 2 Duo E6600.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6100 2.38
+303%
Core 2 Duo E6600 0.59

FX-6100 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6600 by 303% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-6100 3682
+301%
Core 2 Duo E6600 919

FX-6100 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6600 by 301% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-6100 384
+47.1%
Core 2 Duo E6600 261

FX-6100 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6600 by 47% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-6100 1233
+196%
Core 2 Duo E6600 416

FX-6100 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6600 by 196% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.38 0.59
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

The FX-6100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E6600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6100 and Core 2 Duo E6600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6100
FX-6100
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
Core 2 Duo E6600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1005 votes

Rate FX-6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 393 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6100 or Core 2 Duo E6600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.