A9-9425 vs FX-6100

Primary details

Comparing FX-6100 and A9-9425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1692	1920
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.99	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	AMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codename	Zambezi (2011−2012)	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date	12 October 2011 (12 years ago)	31 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Current price	$39	$561

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

FX-6100 and A9-9425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	6 (Hexa-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	6	2
Base clock speed	3.3 GHz	3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.9 GHz	3.7 GHz
L1 cache	288 KB	128K (per core)
L2 cache	6 MB	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	8 MB (shared)	no data
Chip lithography	32 nm	28 nm
Die size	315 mm2	124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	74 °C
Number of transistors	1,200 million	1,200 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No

Compatibility

Information on FX-6100 and A9-9425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	AM3+	FT4
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6100 and A9-9425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	DDR4-2133 RAM (1 channel), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	+
AVX	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6100 and A9-9425 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6100 and A9-9425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6100 and A9-9425.

PCIe version

2.0

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6100 outperforms A9-9425 by 34% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.38	1.77
Recency	12 October 2011	31 May 2016
Physical cores	6	2
Threads	6	2
Chip lithography	32 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	15 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6100 and A9-9425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---