Ryzen 3 7335U vs FX-4350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4350
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
2.14
Ryzen 3 7335U
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 28 Watt
7.46
+249%

Ryzen 3 7335U outperforms FX-4350 by a whopping 249% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4350 and Ryzen 3 7335U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1785910
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.73no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Rembrandt-R
Release date29 April 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$92 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-4350 and Ryzen 3 7335U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed4.2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm6 nm
Die size315 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C95 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.275 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4350 and Ryzen 3 7335U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FP7
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4350 and Ryzen 3 7335U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4350 and Ryzen 3 7335U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4350 and Ryzen 3 7335U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon 660M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4350 and Ryzen 3 7335U.

PCIe versionn/a4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4350 2.14
Ryzen 3 7335U 7.46
+249%

Ryzen 3 7335U outperforms FX-4350 by 249% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-4350 3314
Ryzen 3 7335U 11536
+248%

Ryzen 3 7335U outperforms FX-4350 by 248% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.14 7.46
Recency 29 April 2013 4 January 2023
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 28 Watt

The Ryzen 3 7335U is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4350 in performance tests.

Note that FX-4350 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 7335U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4350 and Ryzen 3 7335U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4350
FX-4350
AMD Ryzen 3 7335U
Ryzen 3 7335U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 529 votes

Rate FX-4350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 7335U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4350 or Ryzen 3 7335U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.