Core 2 Duo E6700 vs FX-8300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8300
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.43
+436%

FX-8300 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by a whopping 436% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8300 and Core 2 Duo E6700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking14802666
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.450.98
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataCore 2 Duo (Desktop)
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Conroe (2006−2007)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)no data
Current price$90 $18

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-8300 has 48% better value for money than Core 2 Duo E6700.

Detailed specifications

FX-8300 and Core 2 Duo E6700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.66 GHz
Bus supportno data1066 MHz
L2 cache8192 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8300 and Core 2 Duo E6700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8300 and Core 2 Duo E6700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8300 and Core 2 Duo E6700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8300 and Core 2 Duo E6700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8300 and Core 2 Duo E6700.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8300 3.43
+436%
Core 2 Duo E6700 0.64

FX-8300 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by 436% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-8300 5307
+436%
Core 2 Duo E6700 990

FX-8300 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by 436% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-8300 457
+42.8%
Core 2 Duo E6700 320

FX-8300 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by 43% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-8300 1734
+218%
Core 2 Duo E6700 546

FX-8300 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6700 by 218% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.43 0.64
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

The FX-8300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E6700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8300 and Core 2 Duo E6700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8300
FX-8300
Intel Core 2 Duo E6700
Core 2 Duo E6700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2233 votes

Rate FX-8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 80 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8300 or Core 2 Duo E6700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.