Xeon E3120 vs FX-4100

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4100
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.65
+85.4%

FX-4100 outperforms Xeon E3120 by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4100 and Xeon E3120 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20692539
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.641.29
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)no data
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)1 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-4100 and Xeon E3120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.16 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHzno data
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache4096 KBno data
L3 cache8192 KB6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °C72 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4100 and Xeon E3120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4100 and Xeon E3120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

FX-4100 and Xeon E3120 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4100 and Xeon E3120 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4100 and Xeon E3120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4100 and Xeon E3120.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4100 1.65
+85.4%
Xeon E3120 0.89

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4100 2619
+86%
Xeon E3120 1408

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.65 0.89
Recency 12 October 2011 1 July 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

FX-4100 has a 85.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E3120, on the other hand, has 46.2% lower power consumption.

The FX-4100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3120 in performance tests.

Note that FX-4100 is a desktop processor while Xeon E3120 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4100 and Xeon E3120, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4100
FX-4100
Intel Xeon E3120
Xeon E3120

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 888 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 10 votes

Rate Xeon E3120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4100 or Xeon E3120, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.