Celeron B710 vs EPYC Embedded 9755
Aggregate performance score
EPYC Embedded 9755 outperforms Celeron B710 by a whopping 159550% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2 | 3829 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 7.94 | 0.07 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Turin (2024−2025) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 11 March 2025 (1 year ago) | 19 June 2011 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $70 |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of EPYC Embedded 9755 and Celeron B710: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 128 | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 256 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 16 |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 512 MB (shared) | 1.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 16x 70.6 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 133,040 million | 504 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 9755 and Celeron B710 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | SP5 | PGA988,PPGA988 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 500 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 9755 and Celeron B710. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FDI | no data | + |
| Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC Embedded 9755 and Celeron B710 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 9755 and Celeron B710 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 9755 and Celeron B710. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of EPYC Embedded 9755 and Celeron B710 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| SDVO | no data | + |
| CRT | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 9755 and Celeron B710.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 95.79 | 0.06 |
| Recency | 11 March 2025 | 19 June 2011 |
| Physical cores | 128 | 1 |
| Threads | 256 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 500 Watt | 35 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 9755 has a 159550% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 12700% more physical cores and 25500% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron B710, on the other hand, has 1329% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC Embedded 9755 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron B710 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC Embedded 9755 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron B710 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
