Xeon 6960P vs EPYC Embedded 9755

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC Embedded 9755
2025
128 cores / 256 threads, 500 Watt
95.85
+25.5%

EPYC Embedded 9755 outperforms Xeon 6960P by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking217
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency7.926.31
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameTurin (2024−2025)Granite Rapids (2024−2026)
Release date11 March 2025 (1 year ago)24 September 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of EPYC Embedded 9755 and Xeon 6960P: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12872 (Doheptaconta-Core)
Threads256144
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache512 MB (shared)432 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size16x 70.6 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors133,040 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC Embedded 9755 and Xeon 6960P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP5FCLGA7529
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 9755 and Xeon 6960P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC Embedded 9755 and Xeon 6960P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 9755 and Xeon 6960P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 9755 and Xeon 6960P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s)
Maximum memory sizeno data3 TB
Max memory channelsno data12
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 9755 and Xeon 6960P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12896

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC Embedded 9755 95.85
+25.5%
Xeon 6960P 76.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC Embedded 9755 164010
+25.5%
Samples: 3
Xeon 6960P 130659
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 95.85 76.36
Recency 11 March 2025 24 September 2024
Physical cores 128 72
Threads 256 144

EPYC Embedded 9755 has a 26% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and 78% more physical cores and 78% more threads.

The AMD EPYC Embedded 9755 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 6960P in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 9755 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 51 votes

Rate Xeon 6960P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC Embedded 9755 and Xeon 6960P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.