Ryzen 5 7520U vs EPYC 9754

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
63.25
+951%

EPYC 9754 outperforms Ryzen 5 7520U by a whopping 951% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 5 7520U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking101034
Place by popularitynot in top-1009
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.62no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Architecture codenameBergamoMendocino-U (Zen 2)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)20 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Current price$7724 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 5 7520U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1284 (Quad-Core)
Threads2568
Base clock speed2.25 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm6 nm
Die size8x 73 mm2100 mm2
Number of transistors71,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 5 7520U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5FP6
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 5 7520U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataLPDDR5-5500 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 5 7520U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 5 7520U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 5 7520U.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes1284

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 63.25
+951%
Ryzen 5 7520U 6.02

EPYC 9754 outperforms Ryzen 5 7520U by 951% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 9754 97836
+951%
Ryzen 5 7520U 9306

EPYC 9754 outperforms Ryzen 5 7520U by 951% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.25 6.02
Recency 13 June 2023 20 September 2022
Physical cores 128 4
Threads 256 8
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 15 Watt

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7520U in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9754 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7520U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 5 7520U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
Ryzen 5 7520U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 31 vote

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1152 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7520U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or Ryzen 5 7520U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.